![]() |
||||||
![]() |
Many people are at least peripherally familiar with low-carb diets, such as Atkins and the South Beach Diet. They seem to work for people. But are these diets really best?
A lot of confusion about low carb diets stems from our primary belief that, at the end of the day, what matters most of all is calories.
The alternative theory about obesity, the Lipophilia Hypothesis, tells us that the best diets must be carbohydrate restricted. Amazingly, calories do not matter after all. What matters is what goes on inside the fat tissue. To get rid of excess fat, we need to somehow liberate that fat from the fat tissue. But if you have too much insulin circulating in your system, triglycerides will remain trapped in the fat tissue, and you won't lose that fat even if you starve yourself and exercise like the devil. Low carb diets, on the other hand, lower insulin levels, allowing triglycerides to escape from the fat tissue. Thus, you lose weight. The implications here are pretty wild. Theoretically, Lipophilia claims that you could gorge yourself on 6,000 calories of bacon a day, for instance, and lose weight. On the other hand, you could eat a starvation ration of 1,000 calories a day and never lose fat, if enough of the calories are "insulinogenic" carbohydrates. The 4 essays below convincingly demonstrate the following points. Click on any link to read: 1. Low carb diets can work even when calories are unrestricted. 2. Low carb diets reduce serum insulin levels. 3. Low carb diets appear to be the best diets for treating many of the "diseases of civilization" associated with obesity. 4. Non-dietary methods of controlling insulin also appear to lead to weight loss and a reduction in the risk of getting other diseases of civilization.
|
|
||||